Parmenides platon7/8/2023 ![]() Subsequently, it will be shown how the dialogues "Republic" and "Parmenides" are connected with each other in content and form (III). This model uses the example of bridle, bridlemaker and rider to explain the primacy of practical knowledge and the limits of propositional knowledge (II). Then the Socratic model of these two types of knowledge is interpreted, which is drafted in the tenth book of the "Republic". To this end, the systematic limits of the discussion about forms, which are particularly evident in Plato's dialogue "Parmenides", are examined in eight steps: First, two types of knowledge are presented that play an important systematic role in Plato's philosophy with regard to the limits of conversation: knowledge-how (practical knowledge) and knowledge-that (propositional knowledge) (I). ![]() This paper aims to provide, as far as possible, newly substantiated answers to these two questions. Another big question of Plato research is whether the conversations documented in the Platonic dialogues are also affected by this verdict. Plato's statement suggests the question, why one does not and never can do justice to the Platonic forms by means of a written text about the forms. ![]() But about these things he says in his "Seventh Letter": "There neither is nor ever will be a treatise of mine on the subject." (341c, transl. įorms (ideas) are among the things that Plato is serious about. Types of Knowledge and Necessity of Forms in Plato's "Parmenides". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |